Paper detail

MOSAIC_SSD: a new web-tool for the Species Sensitivity Distribution, allowing to include censored data by maximum likelihood

Censored data are seldom taken into account in Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) analysis. However, they are found in virtually every dataset and sometimes represent the better part of the data. Stringent recommendations on data quality often lead to discard a lot of this meaningful data, often resulting in datasets of reduced size, which lack representativeness of any realistic community. However, it is reasonably simple to include censored data into SSD by using an extension of the standard maximum likelihood method. In this paper, we detail this approach based on the use of the R-package \emph{fitdistrplus}, dedicated to the fit of parametric probability distributions. In particular, we introduce the new web-tool MOSAIC$\_$SSD to fit an SSD on datasets containing any kind of data, censored or not. MOSAIC$\_$SSD allows predicting any Hazardous Concentration (HC) and provides in addition bootstrap confidence intervals on the prediction. In the end, taking examples from published data, we illustrate the added value of including censored data in SSD.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.