Paper detail

Morphology parameters: substructure identification in X-ray galaxy clusters

In recent years multi-wavelength observations have shown the presence of substructures related to merging events in a high fraction of galaxy clusters. Clusters can be roughly grouped into two categories -- relaxed and non-relaxed -- and a proper characterisation of the dynamical state of these systems is of crucial importance both for astrophysical and cosmological studies. In this paper we investigate the use of a number of morphological parameters (Gini, $M_{20}$, Concentration, Asymmetry, Smoothness, Ellipticity and Gini of the second order moment, $G_{M}$) introduced to automatically classify clusters as relaxed or dynamically disturbed systems. We apply our method to a sample of clusters at different redshifts extracted from the {\it Chandra} archive and we investigate possible correlations between morphological parameters and other X-ray gas properties. We conclude that a combination of the adopted parameters is a very useful tool to properly characterise the X-ray cluster morphology. According to our results three parameters -- Gini, $M_{20}$ and Concentration -- are very promising for identifying cluster mergers. The Gini coefficient is a particularly powerful tool, especially at high redshift, being independent from the choice of the position of the cluster centre. We find that high Gini ($>$ 0.65), high Concentration ($>$ 1.55) and low $M_{20}$ ($<$ -2.0) values are associated with relaxed clusters, while low Gini ($<$ 0.4), low Concentration ($<$ 1.0) and high $M_{20}$ ($>$ -1.4) characterise dynamically perturbed systems. We also estimate the X-ray cluster morphological parameters in the case of {\it radio loud} clusters. In excellent agreement with previous analyses we confirm that diffuse intracluster radio sources are associated with major mergers.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.