Paper detail

Morphology of Fly Larval Class IV Dendrites Accords with a Random Branching and Contact Based Branch Deletion Model

Dendrites are branched neuronal processes that receive input signals from other neurons or the outside world [1]. To maintain connectivity as the organism grows, dendrites must also continue to grow. For example, the dendrites in the peripheral nervous system continue to grow and branch to maintain proper coverage of their receptor fields [2, 3, 4, 5]. One such neuron is the Drosophila melanogaster class IV dendritic arborization neuron [6]. The dendritic arbors of these neurons tile the larval surface [7], where they detect localized noxious stimuli, such as jabs from parasitic wasps [8]. In the present study, we used a novel measure, the hitting probability, to show that the class IV neuron forms a tight mesh that covers the larval surface. Furthermore, we found that the mesh size remains largely unchanged during the larval stages, despite a dramatic increase in overall size of the neuron and the larva. We also found that the class IV dendrites are dense (assayed with the fractal dimension) and uniform (assayed with the lacunarity) throughout the larval stages. To understand how the class IV neuron maintains its morphology during larval development, we constructed a mathematical model based on random branching and self-avoidance. We found that if the branching rate is uniform in space and time and that if all contacting branches are deleted, we can reproduce the branch length distribution, mesh size and density of the class IV dendrites throughout the larval stages. Thus, a simple set of statistical rules can generate and maintain a complex branching morphology during growth.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.