Paper detail

Morphology and evolution of umbral dots and their substructures

Substructures - dark lanes and tails - of umbral dots (UDs) were predicted by numerical simulations of magnetoconvection. We analyse a 6 h 23 min time series of broadband images of a large umbra in the active region NOAA 10634, acquired with the 1-m Swedish Solar Telescope, in the wavelength band around 602 nm. A 43 min part of this series was reconstructed with the MFBD method, reaching a spatial resolution of 0.14". We measure brightness, size, lifetime, and horizontal velocities of various umbral structures. Most (90 %) of UDs and bright point-like features in faint LBs split and merge, and their median lifetimes are 3.5 or 5.7 min, depending on whether the split or merge event is considered as the end of their life. Both UDs and features in faint LBs that do not split or merge are clearly smaller (0.15") than the average size (0.17") of all features. Horizontal motions of umbral bright small-scale features are directed either into the umbra or along faint LBs with mean horizontal velocities of 0.34 km/s. Features faster than 0.4 km/s appear mostly at the periphery of the umbra. The intensity of dark lanes, measured in four bright central UDs (CUDs), is by a factor 0.8 lower than the peak intensity of CUDs. The width of dark lanes is probably less than the resolution limit 0.14". The characteristic time of substructure changes of UDs is ~4 min. We observe narrow (0.14") bright and dark filaments connected with PUDs. Usually one dark and two bright filaments form a 0.4" wide tail attached to one PUD, resembling a short dark-cored penumbral filament. Our results indicate the similarity between PUDs and PGs located at the tips of bright penumbral filaments. The features seen in numerical MHD simulations are consistent with our observations of dark lanes in CUDs and tails attached to PUDs.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.