Paper detail

More on the phi = beta Conjecture and Eigenvalues of Random Graph Lifts

Let $G$ be a connected graph, and let $λ_1$ and $ρ$ denote the spectral radius of $G$ and the universal cover of $G$, respectively. In \cite{Fri03}, Friedman has shown that almost every $n$-lift of $G$ has all of its new eigenvalues bounded by $O(λ_1^{1/2}ρ^{1/2})$. In \cite{LP10}, Linial and Puder have improved this bound to $O(λ_1^{1/3}ρ^{2/3})$. Friedman had conjectured that this bound can actually be improved to $ρ+ o_n(1)$ (e.g., see \cite{Fri03,HLW06}). In \cite{LP10}, Linial and Puder have formulated two new categorizations of formal words, namely $ϕ$ and $β$, which assign a non-negative integer or infinity to each word. They have shown that for every word $w$, $ϕ(w) = 0$ iff $β(w) = 0$, and $ϕ(w) = 1$ iff $β(w) = 1$. They have conjectured that $ϕ(w) = β(w)$ for every word $w$, and have run extensive numerical simulations that strongly suggest that this conjecture is true. This conjecture, if proven true, gives us a very promising approach to proving a slightly weaker version of Friedman's conjecture, namely the bound $O(ρ)$ on the new eigenvalues (see \cite{LP10}). In this paper, we make further progress towards proving this important conjecture by showing that $ϕ(w) = 2$ iff $β(w) = 2$ for every word $w$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.