Paper detail

More lead stars

The standard model for the operation of the s-process in asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars predicts that low-metallicity ([Fe/H] <= -1) AGB stars should exhibit large overabundances of Pb and Bi as compared to other s-elements. Eight CH stars (with [Fe/H] ranging from -1.5 to -2.5) are studied in the present paper using high-resolution spectra (R = lambda/Delta lambda = 135 000), and five of them appear to be enriched in lead (with [Pb/Ce] ~ 0.7). Abundances of heavy elements in these `lead stars' (defined as stars enriched in s-elements and with [Pb/hs] >= 1, hs being any of Ba, La or Ce) are consistent with the predictions for the s-process operating in low-metallicity AGB stars as a consequence of the `partial mixing' of protons below the convective hydrogen envelope. Two among the studied stars (HD 189711 and V Ari) add to a growing number of low-metallicity stars which do not conform to these predictions, however. Variations on the canonical proton-mixing scenario for the operation of the s-process in low-metallicity stars, that could account for these discrepant stars, are briefly discussed.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.