Paper detail

More Evidence for the Redshift Dependence of Color from the JLA Supernova Sample Using Redshift Tomography

In this work, by applying the redshift tomography method to Joint Light-curve Analysis (JLA) supernova sample, we explore the possible redshift-dependence of stretch-luminosity parameter $α$ and color-luminosity parameter $β$. The basic idea is to divide the JLA sample into different redshift bins, assuming that $α$ and $β$ are piecewise constants. Then, by constraining the $Λ$CDM model, we check the consistency of cosmology-fit results given by the SN sample of each redshift bin. We also adopt the same technique to explore the possible evolution of $β$ in various subsamples of JLA. Using the full JLA data, we find that $α$ is always consistent with a constant. In contrast, at high redshift $β$ has a significant trend of decreasing, at $\sim 3.5σ$ confidence level (CL). Moreover, we find that low-$z$ subsample favors a constant $β$; in contrast, SDSS and SNLS subsamples favor a decreasing $β$ at 2$σ$ and $3.3σ$ CL, respectively. Besides, by using a binned parameterization of $β$, we study the impacts of $β$'s evolution on parameter estimation. We find that compared with a constant $β$, a varying $β$ yields a larger best-fit value of fractional matter density $Ω_{m0}$, which slightly deviates from the best-fit result given by other cosmological observations. However, for both the varying $β$ and the constant $β$ cases, the $1σ$ regions of $Ω_{m0}$ are still consistent with the result given by other observations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.