Paper detail

More bisections by hyperplane arrangements

A union of an arrangement of affine hyperplanes $H$ in $R^d$ is the real algebraic variety associated to the principal ideal generated by the polynomial $p_{H}$ given as the product of the degree one polynomials which define the hyperplanes of the arrangement. A finite Borel measure on $R^d$ is bisected by the arrangement of affine hyperplanes $H$ if the measure on the "non-negative side" of the arrangement $\{x\in R^d : p_{H}(x)\ge 0\}$ is the same as the measure on the "non-positive" side $\{x\in R^d : p_{H}(x)\le 0\}$. In 2017 Barba, Pilz \& Schnider considered special cases of the following measure partition hypothesis: For a given collection of $j$ finite Borel measures on $R^d$ there exists a $k$-element affine hyperplane arrangement that bisects each of the measures into equal halves simultaneously. They showed that there are simultaneous bisections in the case when $d=k=2$ and $j=4$. They conjectured that every collection of $j$ measures on $R^d$ can be simultaneously bisected with a $k$-element affine hyperplane arrangement provided that $d\ge \lceil j/k \rceil$. The conjecture was confirmed in the case when $d\ge j/k=2^a$ by Hubard and Karasev in 2018. In this paper we give a different proof of the Hubard and Karasev result using the framework of Blagojević, Frick, Haase \& Ziegler (2016), based on the equivariant relative obstruction theory of tom Dieck, which was developed for handling the Grünbaum--Hadwiger--Ramos hyperplane measure partition problem. Furthermore, this approach allowed us to prove even more, that for every collection of $2^a(2h+1)+\ell$ measures on $R^{2^a+\ell}$, where $1\leq \ell\leq 2^a-1$, there exists a $(2h+1)$-element affine hyperplane arrangement that bisects all of them simultaneously. Our result was extended to the case of spherical arrangements and reproved by alternative methods in a beautiful way by Crabb in 2020.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.