Paper detail

More about the stringy limit of black hole equilibria

We discuss further our proposed modification of the Susskind-Horowitz-Polchinski scenario in which black hole entropy goes over to string entropy as one scales the string length scale up and the string coupling constant down, keeping Newton's constant unchanged. In our approach, based on our 'matter-gravity entanglement hypothesis', 'string entropy' here should be interpreted as the likely entanglement entropy between (approximately) the single long string and the stringy atmosphere which, as we argue, arise in a pure multistring state of given energy in a (rescaled) box. In a previous simple analysis, we computed this entropy (with promising results) by assuming simple exponentially increasing densities of states for both long string and stringy atmosphere. Here, our starting point is a (more correct) density of states for each single string with the appropriate inverse-power prefactor and a low-energy cutoff. We outline how the relevant entanglement entropy should be calculated for this system and propose a plausible model, which draws on the work of Mitchell and Turok on the multi-string microcanonical ensemble, in which we adopt a similar density of states for long string and stringy atmosphere but now with cutoffs which scale with the total energy, E. With this scaling, we still find our entanglement entropy grows, in leading order, linearly with E and this translates to a black-hole entropy which goes as the square of the black-hole mass, thus retaining most of the promising features of our previous exponential-density-of-states model and providing further evidence for our matter-gravity entanglement hypothesis.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.