Paper detail

Monte Carlo simulation of binary mixtures of hard colloidal cuboids

We perform extensive Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the phase behaviour of colloidal suspensions of hard board-like particles (HBPs). While theories restricting particle orientation or ignoring higher ordered phases suggest the existence of a stable biaxial nematic phase, our recent simulation results on monodisperse systems indicate that this is not necessarily the case, even for particle shapes exactly in between prolate and oblate geometries, usually referred to as self-dual shape. Motivated by the potentially striking impact of incorporating biaxial ordering into display applications, we extend our investigation to bidisperse mixtures of short and long HBPs and analyse whether size dispersity can further enrich the phase behaviour of HBPs, eventually destabilise positionally ordered phases and thus favour the formation of the biaxial nematic phase. Not only do our results indicate that bidisperse mixtures of self-dual shaped HBPs cannot self-assemble into biaxial nematic phases, but they also show that these particles are not able to form uniaxial nematic phases either. This surprising behaviour is also observed in monodisperse systems. Additionally, bidisperse HBPs tend to phase separate in coexisting isotropic and smectic phases or, at relatively large pressures, in a smectic phase of mostly short HBPs and a smectic phase of mostly long HBPs. We conclude that limiting the particle orientational degrees of freedom or neglecting the presence of positionally ordered (smectic, columnar and crystal) phases can dramatically alter the phase behaviour of HBPs and unrealistically enlarge the region of stability of the biaxial nematic phase.

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.