Paper detail

Monte-Carlo Simulation of a Multi-Dimensional Switch-Like Model of Stem Cell Differentiation

The process controlling the diferentiation of stem, or progenitor, cells into one specific functional direction is called lineage specification. An important characteristic of this process is the multi-lineage priming, which requires the simultaneous expression of lineage-specific genes. Prior to commitment to a certain lineage, it has been observed that these genes exhibit intermediate values of their expression levels. Multi-lineage differentiation has been reported for various progenitor cells, and it has been explained through the bifurcation of a metastable state. During the differentiation process the dynamics of the core regulatory network follows a bifurcation, where the metastable state, corresponding to the progenitor cell, is destabilized and the system is forced to choose between the possible developmental alternatives. While this approach gives a reasonable interpretation of the cell fate decision process, it fails to explain the multi-lineage priming characteristic. Here, we describe a new multi-dimensional switch-like model that captures both the process of cell fate decision and the phenomenon of multi-lineage priming. We show that in the symmetrical interaction case, the system exhibits a new type of degenerate bifurcation, characterized by a critical hyperplane, containing an infinite number of critical steady states. This critical hyperplane may be interpreted as the support for the multi-lineage priming states of the progenitor. Also, the cell fate decision (the multi-stability and switching behavior) can be explained by a symmetry breaking in the parameter space of this critical hyperplane. These analytical results are confirmed by Monte-Carlo simulations of the corresponding chemical master equations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.