Paper detail

Monotone chains of Fourier coefficients of Hecke cusp forms

We prove general equidistribution statements (both conditional and unconditional) relating to the Fourier coefficients of arithmetically normalized holomorphic Hecke cusp forms $f_1,\ldots,f_k$ without complex multiplication, of equal weight, (possibly different) squarefree level and trivial nebentypus. As a first application, we show that for the Ramanujan $τ$ function and any admissible $k$-tuple of distinct non-negative integers $a_1,\ldots,a_k$ the set $$ \{n \in \mathbb{N} : |τ(n+a_1)| < \cdots < |τ(n+a_k)|\} $$ has positive natural density. This result improves upon recent work of Bilu, Deshouillers, Gun and Luca [Compos. Math. (2018), no. 11, 2441-2461]. Secondly, we make progress towards understanding the signed version by showing that $$ \{n \in \mathbb{N} : τ(n+a_1) < τ(n+a_2) < τ(n+a_3)\} $$ has positive relative upper density at least $1/6$ for any admissible triple of distinct non-negative integers $(a_1,a_2,a_3).$ More generally, for such chains of inequalities of length $k > 3$ we show that under the assumption of Elliott's conjecture on correlations of multiplicative functions, the relative natural density of this set is $1/k!.$ Previously results of such type were known for $k\le 2$ as consequences of works by Serre and by Matomäki and Radziwill. Our results rely crucially on several key ingredients: i) a multivariate Erdős-Kac type theorem for the function $n \mapsto \log|τ(n)|$, conditioned on $n$ belonging to the set of non-vanishing of $τ$, generalizing work of Luca, Radziwill and Shparlinski; ii) the recent breakthrough of Newton and Thorne on the functoriality of symmetric power $L$-functions for $\text{GL}(n)$ for all $n \geq 2$ and its application to quantitative forms of the Sato-Tate conjecture; and iii) the work of Tao and Teräväinen on the logarithmic Elliott conjecture.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.