Paper detail

Monopoles of the Dirac type and color confinement in QCD -- First results of SU(3) numerical simulations without gauge fixing

If non-Abelian gauge fields in $SU(3)$ QCD have a line-singularity leading to non-commutativity with respect to successive partial-derivative operations, the non-Abelian Bianchi identity is violated. The violation as an operator is shown to be equivalent to violation of Abelian-like Bianchi identities. Then there appear eight Abelian-like conserved magnetic monopole currents of the Dirac type in $SU(3)$ QCD. Exact Abelian (but kinematical) symmetries appear in non-Abelian $SU(3)$ QCD. Here we try to show the Abelian dual Meissner effect due to the above Abelian-like monopoles are responsible for color confinement in $SU(3)$ QCD. If this picture is correct, the string tension of non-Abelian Wilson loops is reproduced fully by that of the Abelian Wilson loops. This is called as perfect Abelian dominance. In this report, the perfect Abelian dominance is shown to exist with the help of the multilevel method but without introducing additional smoothing techniques like partial gauge fixings, although lattice sizes studied are not large enough to study the infinite volume limit. Perfect monopole dominance is also shown without any additional gauge fixing. Abelian electric fields are squeezed due to solenoidal monopole currents and the penetration length for an Abelian electric field of a single color is the same as that of non-Abelian electric field. The coherence length is also measured directly through the correlation of the monopole density and the Polyakov loop pair. The Ginzburg-Landau parameter indicates that the vacuum type is the weak type I (dual) superconductor. The results obtained above without any additional assumptions as well as more clear previous $SU(2)$ results seem to suggest strongly the above Abelian dual Meissner picture of color confinement mechanism.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.