Paper detail

Monogamy of quantum entanglement in time

In this paper we state a fundamental question about the structure of correlations in time and analyze temporal monogamy relations. We show that the nature of temporal correlations is inherently different from the spatial ones but in similarity to quantum spatial correlations, we expose a phenomenon of monogamy of quantum entanglement in time. We perform this task applying the entangled histories framework as a modifcation of the consistent histories approach. These considerations are supported by introduction of necessary tools specific for the tensor algebra used for representation of spatial correlations. We show that Tsirelson bound on temporal Bell-like inequalities can be derived from the entangled histories approach. Finally, we point out that in a context of the tensor algebra used for linking states in different times further studies on mathematical structure of the state representing evolving systems are needed.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.