Paper detail

Monogamy inequalities for entanglement using continuous variable measurements

We consider three modes $A$, $B$ and $C$ and derive continuous variable monogamy inequalities that constrain the distribution of bipartite entanglement amongst the three modes. The inequalities hold for all such tripartite states, without the assumption of Gaussian states, and are based on measurements of two conjugate quadrature phase amplitudes $X_{i}$ and $P_{i}$ at each mode $i=A,B$. The first monogamy inequality is $D_{BA}+D_{BC}\geq1$ where $D_{BA}<1$ is the widely used symmetric entanglement criterion, for which $D_{BA}$ is the sum of the variances of $(X_{A}-X_{B})/2$ and $(P_{A}+P_{B})/2$. A second monogamy inequality is $Ent_{BA}Ent_{BC}\geq\frac{1}{\left(1+(g_{BA}^{(sym)})^{2}\right)\left(1+(g_{BC}^{(sym)})^{2}\right)}$ where $Ent_{BA}<1$ is the EPR variance product criterion for entanglement. Here $Ent_{BA}$ is a normalised product of variances of $X_{B}-g_{BA}^{(sym)}X_{A}$ and $P_{B}+g_{BA}^{(sym)}P_{A}$, and $g_{BA}^{(sym)}$ is a parameter that gives a measure of the symmetry between the moments of $A$ and $B$. We also show that the monogamy bounds are increased if a standard steering criterion for the steering of $B$ is not satisfied. We illustrate the monogamy for continuous variable tripartite entangled states including the effects of losses and noise, and identify regimes of saturation of the inequalities. The monogamy relations explain the experimentally observed saturation at $D_{AB}=0.5$ for the entanglement between $A$ and $B$ when both modes have 50\% losses, and may be useful to establish rigorous bounds of correlation for the purpose of quantum key distribution protocols.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.