Paper detail

Monogamy and tradeoff relations for wave-particle duality information

The notions of predictability and visibility are essential in the mathematical formulation of wave particle duality. The work of Jakob and Bergou [Phys. Rev. A 76, 052107] generalises these notions for higher-dimensional quantum systems, which were initially defined for qubits, and subsequently proves a complementarity relation between predictability and visibility. By defining the single-party information content of a quantum system as the addition of predictability and visibility, and assuming that entanglement in a bipartite system in the form of concurrence mutually excludes the single-party information, the authors have proposed a complementarity relation between the concurrence and the single-party information content. We show that the information content of a quantum system defined by Jakob and Bergou is nothing but the Hilbert-Schmidt distance between the state of the quantum system of our consideration and the maximally mixed state. Motivated by the fact that the trace distance is a good measure of distance as compared to the Hilbert-Schmidt distance from the information theoretic point of view, we, in this work, define the information content of a quantum system as the trace distance between the quantum state and the maximally mixed state. We then employ the quantum Pinsker's inequality and the reverse Pinsker's inequality to derive a new complementarity and a reverse complementarity relation between the single-party information content and the entanglement present in a bipartite quantum system in a pure state. As a consequence of our findings, we show that for a bipartite system in a pure state, its entanglement and the predictabilities and visibilities associated with the subsystems cannot be arbitrarily small as well as arbitrarily large.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.