Paper detail

Monochromatic 4-term arithmetic progressions in 2-colorings of $\mathbb Z_n$

This paper is motivated by a recent result of Wolf \cite{wolf} on the minimum number of monochromatic 4-term arithmetic progressions(4-APs, for short) in $\Z_p$, where $p$ is a prime number. Wolf proved that there is a 2-coloring of $\Z_p$ with 0.000386% fewer monochromatic 4-APs than random 2-colorings; the proof is probabilistic and non-constructive. In this paper, we present an explicit and simple construction of a 2-coloring with 9.3% fewer monochromatic 4-APs than random 2-colorings. This problem leads us to consider the minimum number of monochromatic 4-APs in $\Z_n$ for general $n$. We obtain both lower bound and upper bound on the minimum number of monochromatic 4-APs in all 2-colorings of $\Z_n$. Wolf proved that any 2-coloring of $\Z_p$ has at least $(1/16+o(1))p^2$ monochromatic 4-APs. We improve this lower bound into $(7/96+o(1))p^2$. Our results on $\Z_n$ naturally apply to the similar problem on $[n]$ (i.e., $\{1,2,..., n\}$). In 2008, Parillo, Robertson, and Saracino \cite{prs} constructed a 2-coloring of $[n]$ with 14.6% fewer monochromatic 3-APs than random 2-colorings. In 2010, Butler, Costello, and Graham \cite{BCG} extended their methods and used an extensive computer search to construct a 2-coloring of $[n]$ with 17.35% fewer monochromatic 4-APs (and 26.8% fewer monochromatic 5-APs) than random 2-colorings. Our construction gives a 2-coloring of $[n]$ with 33.33% fewer monochromatic 4-APs (and 57.89% fewer monochromatic 5-APs) than random 2-colorings.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.