Paper detail

Monadic Dynamics

We develop a monadic framework formalising an operational notion of dynamics, seen as the setting and evolution of initial value problems, in general physical theories. We identify in the Eilenberg-Moore category the natural environment for dynamical systems and characterise Cauchy surfaces abstractly as automorphisms in the Kleisli category. Our main results formally vindicates the Aristotelian view that time and change are defined by one another. We show that dynamics which respect the compositional structure of physical systems always define a canonical notion of time, and give the conditions under which they can be faithfully seen as actions of time on physical systems. Finally, we construct state spaces and path spaces, and show that our framework to be equivalent to the path space approaches to dynamics. The monadic standpoint is thus as strong as the established paradigms, but the shift from histories to dynamics helps shed new light on the nature of time in physics. In the appendix we present some additional structures of wide applicability, introduce prop- agators and draft applications to quantum theory, classical mechanics and network theory.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.