Paper detail

Momentum-Transfer Framework Unifies High-Velocity Impact and Failure Across Materials, Geometries, and Scales

Materials that dissipate energy efficiently under high-speed impacts, from micrometeoroid strikes on spacecraft to ballistic penetration in protective systems, are essential for maintaining structural integrity in extreme environments. Yet, despite decades of study, predicting and comparing impact performance across materials, geometries, and length scales remains challenging because conventional projectile-impact models often rely on conservation-based or empirically partitioned descriptions that assume the projectile-target interaction is a closed system. Here, we relax this assumption and directly observe the momentum and energy transferred out of the projectile during impact. We find that the momentum transferred to the target consistently reaches its maximum at the ballistic-limit velocity, demonstrated through a coordinated suite of micro-projectile impact experiments spanning varied projectile diameters, target thicknesses, and impact velocities, and further supported by targeted macroscale tests. This behavior is reinforced across a broad range of independent studies encompassing metals, polymers, composites, sandwich panels, and reinforced concrete, with thicknesses ranging from nanometers to hundreds of millimeters and projectiles of spherical, blunt, ogive, and conical shape, under both normal and oblique impacts. Together, these observations reveal a consistent impact behavior across all available data: maximum momentum transfer occurs at the ballistic limit. Extending this bound into the energy absorption landscape addresses an entrenched misconception in the field by revealing that specific energy absorption inherently inflates the performance of thinner targets due to geometric normalization, rather than reflecting genuine material enhancement.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.