Paper detail

Moment based gene set tests

{\bf Motivation:} Permutation-based gene set tests are standard approaches for testing relationshi ps between collections of related genes and an outcome of interest in high throughput expression analyses. Using $M$ random permutations, one can attain $p$-values as small as $1/(M+1)$. When many gene sets are tested, we need smaller $p$-values, hence larger $M$, to achieve significance while accounting for the n umber of simultaneous tests being made. As a result, the number of permutations to be done rises along with the cost per permutation. To reduce this cost, we seek parametric approximations to the permutation distributions for gene set tes ts. {\bf Results:} We focus on two gene set methods related to sums and sums of squared $t$ statistics. Our approach calculates exact relevant moments of a weighted sum of (squared) test statistics under permutation. We find moment-based gene set enrichment $p$-values that closely approximate the permutation method $p$-values. The computational cost of our algorithm for linear statistics is on the order of doing $|G|$ permutations, where $|G|$ is the number of genes in set $G$. For the quadratic statistics, the cost is on the order of $|G|^2$ permutations which is orders of magnitude faster than naive permutation. We applied the permutation approximation method to three public Parkinson's Disease expression datasets and discovered enriched gene sets not previously discussed. In the analysis of these experiments with our method, we are able to remove the granularity effects of permutation analyses and have a substantial computational speedup with little cost to accura cy. {\bf Availability:} Methods available as a Bioconductor package, npGSEA (www.bioconductor.org). {\bf Contact:} {larson.jessica@gene.com} \end{abstract}

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.