Paper detail

Molecular remnant of Nova 1670 (CK Vulpeculae). II. A three-dimensional view on the gas distribution and velocity field

CK Vul is the remnant of an energetic eruption known as Nova 1670 that is thought to be caused by a stellar merger. The remnant is composed of (1) a large hourglass nebula of recombining gas (of 71\arcsec size), very similar to some classical planetary and pre-planetary nebulae (PPNe), and (2) of a much smaller and cooler inner remnant prominent in millimeter-wave emission from molecules. We investigate the three-dimensional spatio-kinematic structure of both components. The analysis of the hourglass structure yields a revised distance to the object of >2.6 kpc, at least 3.7 times greater than so far assumed. At this distance, the stellar remnant has a bolometric luminosity >12 L$_{\odot}$ and is surrounded by molecular material of total mass >0.8 M$_{\odot}$ (the latter value has a large systematic uncertainty). We also analyzed the architecture of the inner molecular nebula using ALMA observations of rotational emission lines obtained at subarcsecond resolution. We find that the distribution of neutral and ionized gas in the lobes can be reproduced by several nested and incomplete shells or jets with different velocity fields and varying orientations. The analysis indicates that the molecular remnant was created in several ejection episodes, possibly involving an interacting binary system. We calculated the linear momentum ($\approx$10$^{40}$ g cm s$^{-1}$) and kinetic energy ($\approx$10$^{47}$ erg) of the CK Vul outflows and find them within the limits typical for classical PPNe. Given the similarities of the CK Vul outflows to PPNe, we suggest there may CK Vul analogs among wrongly classified PPNe with low intrinsic luminosities, especially among PPNe with post-red-giant-branch central stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.