Paper detail

Molecular outflows in local galaxies: Method comparison and a role of intermittent AGN driving

We report new detections and limits from a NOEMA and ALMA CO(1-0) search for molecular outflows in 13 local galaxies with high FIR surface brightness, and combine with results from the literature. CO line ratios and outflow structure provide some constraints on the conversion from observables to quantities such as molecular mass outflow rates. Ratios between outflow emission in higher J CO transitions and in CO(1-0) typically are consistent with excitation Ri1<~1. For IRAS 13120-5453, however, R31=2.10 indicates optically thin CO in the outflow. Like much of the outflow literature, we use alpha(CO) = 0.8, and we present arguments for using C=1 in deriving molecular mass outflow rates Mdot = C*M*v/R. We compare the two main methods for molecular outflow detection: CO mm interferometry and Herschel OH spectroscopy. For 26 sources studied with both methods, we find 80% agreement in detecting vout>~150km/s outflows, and non-matches can be plausibly ascribed to outflow geometry and SNR. For 12 bright ULIRGs with detailed OH-based outflow modeling, CO outflows are detected in all but one. Outflow masses, velocities, and sizes for these 11 sources agree well between the two methods, and modest remaining differences may relate to the different but overlapping regions sampled by CO emission and OH absorption. Outflow properties correlate better with AGN luminosity and with bolometric luminosity than with FIR surface brightness. The most massive outflows are found for systems with current AGN activity, but significant outflows in non-AGN systems must relate to star formation or to AGN activity in the recent past. We report scaling relations for the increase of outflow mass, rate, momentum rate, and kinetic power with bolometric luminosity. Short ~10^6yr flow times and some sources with resolved multiple outflow episodes support a role of intermittent driving, likely by AGN. (abridged)

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.