Paper detail

Molecular information theory meets protein folding

We propose an application of molecular information theory to analyze the folding of single domain proteins. We analyze results from various areas of protein science, such as sequence-based potentials, reduced amino acid alphabets, backbone configurational entropy, secondary structure content, residue burial layers, and mutational studies of protein stability changes. We found that the average information contained in the sequences of evolved proteins is very close to the average information needed to specify a fold ~2.2 $\pm$ 0.3 bits/(site operation). The effective alphabet size in evolved proteins equals the effective number of conformations of a residue in the compact unfolded state at around 5. We calculated an energy-to-information conversion efficiency upon folding of around 50%, lower than the theoretical limit of 70%, but much higher than human built macroscopic machines. We propose a simple mapping between molecular information theory and energy landscape theory and explore the connections between sequence evolution, configurational entropy and the energetics of protein folding.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.