Paper detail

Molecular hydrogen regulated star formation in cosmological SPH simulations

It has been shown observationally that star formation (SF) correlates tightly with the presence of molecular hydrogen (H$_2$). Therefore it would be important to investigate its implication on galaxy formation in a cosmological context. In the present work, we track the H$_2$ mass fraction within our cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code GADGET-3 using an equilibrium analytic model by Krumholz et al. This model allows us to regulate the star formation in our simulation by the local abundance of H$_2$ rather than the total cold gas density, and naturally introduce the dependence of star formation on metallicity. We investigate implications of the equilibrium H$_2$-based SF model on galaxy population properties, such as the stellar-to-halo mass ratio (SHMR), baryon fraction, cosmic star formation rate density (SFRD), galaxy specific SFR, galaxy stellar mass functions (GSMF), and Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) relationship. The advantage of our work over the previous ones is having a large sample of simulated galaxies in a cosmological volume from high-redshift to $z=0$. We find that low-mass halos with M$_{DM}<10^{10.5}$ M$_\odot$ are less efficient in producing stars in the H$_2$-based SF model at $z\geq6$, which brings the simulations to a better agreement with observational estimates of SHMR and GSMF at the low-mass end. This is particularly evident by a reduction in the number of low-mass galaxies at M$_\star\leq10^{8}$ M$_\odot$ in the GSMF. The overall SFRD is also reduced at high-$z$ in the H$_2$ run, which results in slightly higher SFRD at low-redshift due to more abundant gas available for star formation at later times. This new H$_2$ model is able to reproduce the empirical KS relationship at $z=0$ naturally without the need for setting its normalization by hand, and overall it seems to have more advantages than the previous pressure-based SF model.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.