Paper detail

Molecular hydrogen in Lyman Alpha Emitters

We present a physically motivated model to estimate the molecular hydrogen (H2) content of high-redshift (z~5.7,6.6) Lyman Alpha Emitters (LAEs) extracted from a suite of cosmological simulations. We find that the H2 mass fraction, (f_H2), depends on three main LAE physical properties: (a) star formation rate, (b) dust mass, and (c) cold neutral gas mass. At z~5.7, the value of f_H2 peaks and ranges between 0.5-0.9 for intermediate mass LAEs with stellar mass M_* ~ 10^{9-10} solar mass, decreasing for both smaller and larger galaxies. However, the largest value of the H2 mass is found in the most luminous LAEs. These trends also hold at z\sim6.6, although, due to a lower dust content, f_H2(z=6.6)\sim0.5 f_H2(z=5.7) when averaged over all LAEs; they arise due to the interplay between the H2 formation/shielding controlled by dust and the intensity of the ultraviolet (UV) Lyman-Werner photo-dissociating radiation produced by stars. We then predict the carbon monoxide (CO) luminosities for such LAEs and check that they are consistent with the upper limits found by Wagg et al. (2009) for two z>6 LAEs. At z\sim(5.7, 6.6), the lowest CO rotational transition observable for both samples with the actual capabilities of Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) is the CO(6-5). We find that at z\sim5.7, about 1-2% of LAEs, i.e., those with an observed Lyman Alpha luminosity larger than 10^{43.2} erg/s would be detectable with an integration time of 5-10 hours (S/N=5); at z\sim6.6 none of the LAEs would be detectable in CO, even with an ALMA integration time of 10 hours. We also build the CO `flux function', i.e., the number density of LAEs as a function of the line-integrated CO flux, S_CO, and show that it peaks at S_CO = 0.1 mJy at z\sim5.7, progressively shifting to lower values at higher redshifts. We end by discussing the model uncertainties.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.