Paper detail

Molecular Gas in Mrk 109: Constraining the O2/CO Ratio in Chemically Young Galaxies

We report on observations of CO(1-0) emission from the chemically young starburst galaxy Mrk 109. These observations were part of a study to constrain the O2/CO ratio in metal-deficient galaxies, which were motivated by theoretical work that suggests the possible enhancement of the O2/CO ratio in chemically young systems. Five low metallicity (Z < 0.5 Z(solar)) IRAS galaxies at redshifts z > 0.02 (required to shift the 118.75 GHz O2 line away from the atmospheric line) were searched for CO emission. We detected the CO line in only Mrk 109. From O2 observations of Mrk 109, we achieved an upper limit for the O2 column density abundance ratio of N(O2)/N(CO) < 0.31. These results provide useful constraints for the theoretical models of chemically young galaxies. We argue that either most of the molecular gas in Mrk 109 does not reside in dark clouds (Av >~ 5), or the standard equilibrium chemistry models are inadequate for metal-poor systems. The molecular gas mass implied by the CO observations of Mrk 109 is M(H2) ~= 4 x 10^{9} M(sun), and the CO data are consistent with a central starburst induced by the interaction with a nearby companion.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.