Paper detail

Molecular gas in distant brightest cluster galaxies

The stellar mass assembly of brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) is still debated. We have observed in CO with the IRAM-30m two star forming BCGs belonging to SpARCS clusters, 3C 244.1 ($z=0.4$) and SDSS J161112.65+550823.5 ($z=0.9$), and compared their molecular gas and star formation properties with those of a compilation of $\sim100$ distant cluster galaxies, including nine additional distant BCGs at ${z\sim0.4-3.5}$. We have set robust upper limits of $M_{{\rm H}_2}<1.0\times10^{10}~M_\odot$ and $<2.8\times10^{10}~M_\odot$ to their molecular gas content, respectively, as well as to the molecular gas to stellar mass ratio $M({\rm H}_2)/M_\star\lesssim0.2$ and depletion time $τ_{\rm dep}\lesssim40$ Myr of the two targeted BCGs. They are thus among the distant cluster galaxies with the lowest gas fractions and shortest depletion times. The majority, $64\%\pm15\%$ and $73\%\pm18\%$, of the 11 BCGs with observations in CO have lower $M({\rm H}_2)/M_\star$ and $τ_{\rm dep}$, respectively, than those estimated for main sequence galaxies. Statistical analysis tentatively suggests that the values of $M({\rm H}_2)/M_\star$ and $τ_{\rm dep}$ for the 11 BCGs deviates, with a significance of $\sim2σ$, from those of the comparison sample of cluster galaxies. A morphological analysis for a subsample of seven BCGs with archival HST observations reveals that $71\%\pm17\%$ of the BCGs are compact or show star-forming substructures/components. Our results suggest a scenario where distant star forming BCGs assemble a significant fraction $\sim16\%$ of their stellar mass in the relatively short timescale $τ_{\rm dep}$, while environmental mechanisms might prevent the replenishment of gas feeding the star formation. We speculate that compact components favor the rapid exhaustion of molecular gas and help to quench the BCGs. Distant star forming BCGs are excellent targets for ALMA and JWST.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.