Paper detail

Molecular Cloud Evolution V. Cloud Destruction by Stellar Feedback

We present a numerical study of the evolution of molecular clouds, from their formation by converging flows in the warm ISM, to their destruction by the ionizing feedback of the massive stars they form. We improve with respect to our previous simulations by including a different stellar-particle formation algorithm, which allows them to have masses corresponding to single stars rather than to small clusters, and with a mass distribution following a near-Salpeter stellar IMF. We also employ a simplified radiative-transfer algorithm that allows the stellar particles to feed back on the medium at a rate that depends on their mass and the local density. Our results are as follows: a) Contrary to the results from our previous study, where all stellar particles injected energy at a rate corresponding to a star of ~ 10 Msun, the dense gas is now completely evacuated from 10-pc regions around the stars within 10-20 Myr, suggesting that this feat is accomplished essentially by the most massive stars. b) At the scale of the whole numerical simulations, the dense gas mass is reduced by up to an order of magnitude, although star formation (SF) never shuts off completely, indicating that the feedback terminates SF locally, but new SF events continue to occur elesewhere in the clouds. c) The SF efficiency (SFE) is maintained globally at the ~ 10% level, although locally, the cloud with largest degree of focusing of its accretion flow reaches SFE ~ 30%. d) The virial parameter of the clouds approaches unity before the stellar feedback begins to dominate the dynamics, becoming much larger once feedback dominates, suggesting that clouds become unbound as a consequence of the stellar feedback. e) The erosion of the filaments that feed the star-forming clumps produces chains of isolated dense blobs reminiscent of those observed in the vicinity of the dark globule B68.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.