Paper detail

Modulations in the radio light curve of the Type IIb Supernova 2001ig: Evidence for a Wolf-Rayet binary progenitor?

We describe the radio evolution of SN 2001ig in NGC 7424, from 700 days of multi-frequency monitoring with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) and the Very Large Array (VLA). We find that deviations of the radio light curves at each frequency from the standard "minishell" model are consistent with density modulations in the circumstellar medium (CSM), which seem to recur with a period near 150 days. One possibility is that these are due to enhanced mass-loss from thermal pulses in an AGB star progenitor. A more likely scenario however is that the progenitor was a Wolf-Rayet star, whose stellar wind collided with that from a massive hot companion on an eccentric 100 day orbit, leading to a regular build-up of CSM material on the required time and spatial scales. Recent observations of "dusty pinwheels" in Wolf-Rayet binary systems lend credibility to this model. Since such binary systems are also thought to provide the necessary conditions for envelope-stripping which would cause the Wolf-Rayet star to appear as a Type Ib/c supernova event rather than a Type II, these radio observations of SN 2001ig may provide the key to linking Type Ib/c SNe to Type IIb events, and even to some types of Gamma-Ray Bursts.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.