Paper detail

Modified theories of gravity with nonminimal coupling and orbital particle dynamics

We consider a non-rotating, massive test particle acted upon by a "pressure"-type, non-geodesic acceleration arising from a certain general class of gravitational theories with nonminimal coupling between the matter and the metric. The resulting orbital perturbations for a two-body system are investigated both analytically and numerically. Among the other long-term effects, a secular increase of the two-body relative distance occurs. In principle, it may yield a physical mechanism for the steady recession of the Earth from the Sun recently proposed to explain the Faint Young Sun Paradox in the Archean eon. At present, the theorists have not yet derived explicit expressions for some of the key parameters of the model, such as the integrated "charge" $ξ$, depending on the matter distribution of the system, and the 4-vector $K^μ=\{K^0,\boldsymbol{K}\}$ connected with the nonminimal function $F$. Thus, we phenomenologically treat them as free parameters, and preliminarily infer some indications on their admissible values according to the most recent Solar System's planetary ephemerides. From the latest determinations of the corrections $Δ\dot\varpi$ to the standard perihelion precessions, estimated by the astronomers who produced the EPM2011 ephemerides without modeling the theory considered here, we preliminarily obtain $|ξK|\lesssim 0.1$ kg s$^{-1}$ for Mars. From guesses on what could be the current bounds on the secular rates of change of the planetary semimajor axes, we get $|ξK^0|\lesssim 1249$ kg s$^{-1}$ for Mars. More effective constraints could be posed by reprocessing the same planetary data sets with dedicated dynamical models including the effects studied here, and explicitly estimating the associated parameters. COBE and GP-B terrestrial satellites yield $|ξK|\lesssim 2\times 10^{-4}$ kg s$^{-1}$ and $|ξK_0|\lesssim 2\times 10^{-10}$ kg s$^{-1}$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.