Paper detail

Modification of electromagnetic structure functions for the $γZ$-box diagram

The $γZ$-box diagram for parity violating elastic $e$-$p$ scattering has recently undergone a thorough analysis by several research groups. Though all now agree on the analytic form of the diagram, the numerical results differ due to the treatment of the structure functions, $F_{1,2,3}^{γZ}(x,Q^2)$. Currently, $F_{1,2,3}^{γZ}(x,Q^2)$ at low $Q^2$ and $W^2$ must be approximated through the modification of existing fits to electromagnetic structure function data. We motivate and describe the modification used to obtain $F_{1,2}^{γZ}(x,Q^2)$ in our previous work. We also describe an alternative modification and compare the result to our original calculation. Finally, we present a new modification procedure to acquire $F_3^{γZ}(x,Q^2)$ in the resonance region and calculate the axial contribution to the $γZ$-box diagram. Details of these modifications will illuminate where discrepancies between the groups arise and where future improvements can be made.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.