Paper detail

Moderate Deviations in Cycle Count

We prove moderate deviations bounds for the lower tail of the number of odd cycles in a $\calG(n, m)$ random graph. We show that the probability of decreasing triangle density by $t^3$, is $\exp(-Θ(n^2 t^2))$ whenever $n^{-3/4} \ll t^3 \ll 1$, while for $k \ge 5$ we give the same estimate for the probability of decreasing the $k$-cycle density by $t^k$, but for the larger range $n^{-1} \ll t^k \ll 1$. When $m \ge \frac 12 \binom n2$, we also find the leading coefficient in the exponent. This complements results of Goldschmidt et al., who showed that for $n^{-3/2} \ll t^k \ll n^{-1}$, the probability is $\exp(-Θ(n^3 t^{2k}))$. That is, deviations of order smaller than $n^{-1}$ behave like small deviations, and deviations of order larger than $n^{-3/4}$ (for triangles) or $n^{-1}$ (for $k$-cycles with $k \ge 5$) behave like large deviations. For triangles, we conjecture that a sharp change between the two regimes occurs for deviations of size $n^{-3/4}$, which we associate with a single large negative eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix becoming responsible for almost all of the cycle deficit. Our results can be interpreted as finite size effects in phase transitions in constrained random graphs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.