Paper detail

Models of $μ$ Her with asteroseismic constraints

Using the Yale stellar evolution code, models of mu Her based on asteroseismic measurements are constructed. A $χ^{2}$ minimization is performed to approach the best modeling parameters which reproduce the observations within their errors. By combining all non-asteroseismic constraints with asteroseismic measurements, we find that the observational constraints favour a model with a mass of 1.00$^{+ 0.01}_{- 0.02}$ $M_{\odot}$, an age t = 6.433 $\pm$ 0.04 Gyr, a mixing-length parameter $α$ = 1.75 $\pm$ 0.25, an initial hydrogen abundance $X_{i}$ = 0.605$^{+ 0.01}_{- 0.005}$ and metal abundance $Z_{i}$ = 0.0275$^{+ 0.002}_{- 0.001}$. mu Her is in post-main sequence phase of evolution. The modes of $l$ = 1 show up the characteristics of avoided crossings, which may be applied to test the internal structure of this type stars. Asteroseismic measurements can be used as a complementary constraint on the modeling parameters. The models with mass 1.00 - 1.10 $M_{\odot}$ can reproduce the observational constraints. Existing observed data of mu Her do not rule out these models.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.