Paper detail

Modelling X-shaped Radio Galaxies: Dynamical and Emission Signatures from the Back-flow model

Some of the radio galaxies show distortion in their jets, forming tailed or winged sources. X-shaped radio galaxies are a subclass of winged sources formation mechanism of which is still unclear. The focus of this work is to understand hydro-dynamical back-flows and their role in dynamics and non-thermal emission signatures (in presence of radiative losses and diffusive shock acceleration) during the initial phase of these galaxies. We have performed relativistic MHD simulations of an under-dense jet travelling in a tri-axial ambient using a hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian framework to incorporate effects of micro-physical processes. We have demonstrated the dominant role played by pressure gradient in shaping XRGs in thermally dominated cases. We show that the prominence of the formed structure decreases as the jet deviates from the major axis of the ambient. The wing evolution is mainly governed by re-energized particles due to shocks that keep the structure active during the evolution time. The synthetic intensity maps of the radio galaxy show similarities with morphologies that are typically found in observed XRGs. This includes the cases with wider wings than the active lobes. The characteristic emission signatures in terms of its synchrotron spectra and implication of equipartition condition in age estimation are also discussed here. Additionally, we show that discrepancy of age can be attributed to mixing of different aged particle populations. Further, the effect of viewing angle on the difference of spectral index of the active lobes and the wings $(Δα)$ shows a large variation and degenerate behaviour. We have demonstrated the role of diffusive shocks in the obtained variation and have concluded that the spread of $(Δα)$ is not a dependable characteristic in determining the formation model of XRGs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.