Paper detail

Modelling the stochasticity of high-redshift halo bias

A very large dynamic range with simultaneous capture of both large- and small-scales in the simulations of cosmic structures is required for correct modelling of many cosmological phenomena, particularly at high redshift. This is not always available, or when it is, it makes such simulations very expensive. We present a novel sub-grid method for modelling low-mass ($10^5\,M_\odot\leq M_{\rm halo}\leq 10^9\,M_\odot$) haloes, which are otherwise unresolved in large-volume cosmological simulations limited in numerical resolution. In addition to the deterministic halo bias that captures the average property, we model its stochasticity that is correlated in time. We find that the instantaneous binned distribution of the number of haloes is well approximated by a log-normal distribution, with overall amplitude modulated by this "temporal correlation bias". The robustness of our new scheme is tested against various statistical measures, and we find that temporally correlated stochasticity generates mock halo data that is significantly more reliable than that from temporally uncorrelated stochasticity. Our method can be applied for simulating processes that depend on both the small- and large-scale structures, especially for those that are sensitive to the evolution history of structure formation such as the process of cosmic reionization. As a sample application, we generate a mock distribution of medium-mass ($ 10^{8} \leq M/M_{\odot} \leq 10^{9}$) haloes inside a 500 Mpc$\,h^{-1}$, $300^3$ grid simulation box. This mock halo catalogue bears a reasonable statistical agreement with a halo catalogue from numerically-resolved haloes in a smaller box, and therefore will allow a very self-consistent sets of cosmic reionization simulations in a box large enough to generate statistically reliable data.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.