Paper detail

Modelling the Impact of Screening Men for Chlamydia Trachomatis on the Prevalence in Women

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most commonly reported infectious disease in the United States and causes important reproductive morbidity in women. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommended routine screening of sexually active women under age 25 but have not recommended screening among men. Consequently, untested and untreated men may serve as a reservoir of infection in women. Despite three decades of screening women, the chlamydia prevalence has continued to increase. Moreover, chlamydia is five times more common in African American (AA) youth compared to Whites, constituting an important health disparity. The Check It program is a bundled Ct intervention targeting AA men aged 15-24 who have sex with women. We created an individual-based network model to simulate a realistic chlamydia epidemic on sexual contact networks for the target population. Based on the practice in Check It, we quantified the impact of screening young AA men on the chlamydia prevalence in women. We used sensitivity analysis to quantify the relative importance of each Check It intervention component, and the significance ranked from high to low was venue-based screening, expedited index treatment, expedited partner treatment, rescreening. We estimated that by annually screening 7.5% of the target male population, the chlamydia prevalence would be reduced by 8.1% and 8.8% in men and women, respectively. The findings suggested that male-screening has the potential to significantly reduce the prevalence among women.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.