Paper detail

Modelling the Growth of Supermassive Black Holes in Cosmological Simulations

There is strong evidence that supermassive black holes reside in all galaxies that contain a stellar spheroid and their mass is tightly correlated with properties such as stellar bulge mass and velocity dispersion. There are also strong theoretical arguments that feedback from supermassive black holes plays an important role in shaping the high mass end of the galaxy mass function, hence to accurately model galaxies we also need to model the black holes. We present a comparison of two black hole growth models implemented within a large-scale, cosmological SPH simulation including star formation and feedback. One model is a modified Bondi-Hoyle prescription that grows black holes based on the smooth density of local gas, while the other is the recently proposed Accretion Disc Particle (ADP) method. This model swallows baryonic particles that pass within an accretion radius of the black hole and adds them to a subgrid accretion disc. Black holes are then grown by material from this disc. We find that both models can reproduce local scaling relations, although the ADP model is offset from the observed relations at high black hole masses. The total black hole mass density agrees between models to within a factor of three, but both struggle to reproduce the black hole mass function. The simulated mass functions are too steep and underestimate the number of intermediate and high mass black holes. In addition, the ADP model swallows excessive amounts of material at the resolution of large-scale, cosmological simulations producing unrealistically large accretion discs. Future work needs to be performed to improve the black hole mass function within simulations. This should be done through the mass growth and feedback as they are strongly coupled and should not be treated as separate entities.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.