Paper detail

Modelling polarization properties of comet 1P/Halley using a mixture of compact and aggregate particles

Recently, the result obtained from `Stardust' mission suggests that the overall ratio of compact to aggregate particles is 65:35 (or 13:7) for Comet 81P/Wild 2 (Burchell et al. 2008). In the present work, we propose a model which considers cometary dust as a mixture of compact and aggregate particles, with composition of silicate and organic. We consider compact particles as spheroidal particles and aggregates as BCCA and BAM2 aggregate with some size distribution. For modeling Comet 1P/ Halley, the power-law size distribution n(a)= a^{-2.6}, for both compact and aggregate particles is taken. We take a mixture of BAM2 and BCCA aggregates with a lower and upper cutoff size around 0.20$μm$ and 1$μm$. We also take a mixture of prolate, spherical and oblate compact particles with axial ratio (E) from 0.8 to 1.2 where a lower and upper cutoff size around 0.1$μm$ and 10$μm$ are taken. Using T-matrix code, the average simulated polarization curves are generated which can best fit the observed polarization data at the four wavelengths $λ$ = 0.365$μm$, 0.485$μm$, 0.670$μm$ and 0.684$μm$. The suitable mixing percentage of aggregates emerging out from the present modeling corresponds to 50% BAM2 and 50% BCCA particles and silicate to organic mixing percentage corresponds to 78% silicate and 22% organic in terms of volume. The present model successfully reproduces the observed polarization data, especially the negative branch, more effectively as compared to other work done in the past. It is found that among the aggregates, the BAM2 aggregate plays a major role, in deciding the cross-over angle and depth of negative polarization branch.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.