Paper detail

Modelling lipid-coated microbubbles in focused ultrasound applications at subresonance frequencies

We present a computational study of the behaviour of a lipid-coated SonoVue microbubble with initial radius $1 \, μ\text{m} \leq R_0 \leq 2 \, μ\text{m}$, excited at frequencies (200-1500 kHz) significantly below the linear resonance frequency and pressure amplitudes of up to 1500 kPa, an excitation regime used in many focused ultrasound applications. The bubble dynamics are simulated using the Rayleigh-Plesset equation and the Gilmore equation, in conjunction with the Marmottant model for the lipid monolayer coating. Also, a new continuously differentiable variant of the Marmottant model is introduced. Below the onset of inertial cavitation, a linear regime is identified in which the maximum pressure at the bubble wall is linearly proportional to the excitation pressure amplitude and, likewise, the mechanical index. This linear regime is bounded by the Blake pressure and, in line with recent in vitro experiments, the onset of inertial cavitation is found to occur approximately at an excitation pressure amplitude of 130-190 kPa, dependent on the initial bubble size. In the nonlinear regime the maximum pressure at the bubble wall is found to be readily predicted by the maximum bubble radius and both the Rayleigh-Plesset and Gilmore equations are shown to predict the onset of sub- and ultraharmonic frequencies of the acoustic emissions compared to in vitro experiments. Neither the surface dilatational viscosity of the lipid monolayer nor the compressibility of the liquid have a discernible influence on the studied quantities, yet accounting for the lipid coating is critical for the accurate prediction of the bubble behaviour. The Gilmore equation is shown to be valid for the considered bubbles and excitation regime, and the Rayleigh-Plesset equation also provides accurate qualitative predictions, even though it is outside its range of validity for many of the considered cases.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.