Paper detail

Modelling intergalactic low ionisation metal absorption line systems near the epoch of reionization

We interpret observations of intergalactic low ionisation metal absorption systems at redshifts z $\gtrsim$5 in terms of pressure-confined clouds. We find clouds confined by the expected pressure of galactic haloes with masses $11<\log M_h/h^{-1}M_\odot<12$ provide a good description of the column density ratios between low ionisation metal absorbers. Some of the ratios, however, require extending conventional radiative transfer models of irradiated slabs to spherical (or cylindrical) clouds to allow for lines of sight passing outside the cores of the clouds. Moderate depletion of silicon onto dust grains is also indicated in some systems. The chemical abundances inferred span the range between solar and massive-star dominated stellar populations as may arise in starburst galaxies. The typical HI column densities matching the data correspond to Damped Lyman-$α$ Absorbers (DLAs) or sub-DLAs, with sizes of 40 pc to 3 kpc, gas masses $3.5<\log M_c/M_\odot<8$ and metallicites $0.001-0.01Z_\odot$. Such systems continue to pose a challenge for galaxy-scale numerical simulations to reproduce.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.