Paper detail

Modelling host population support for combat adversaries

We consider a model of adversarial dynamics consisting of three populations, labelled Blue, Green and Red, which evolve under a system of first order nonlinear differential equations. Red and Blue populations are adversaries and interact via a set of Lanchester combat laws. Green is divided into three sub-populations: Red supporters, Blue supporters and Neutral. Green support for Red and Blue leads to more combat effectiveness for either side. From Green's perspective, if either Red or Blue exceed a size according to the capacity of the local population to facilitate or tolerate, then support for that side diminishes; the corresponding Green population reverts to the neutral sub-population, who do not contribute to combat effectiveness of either side. The mechanism for supporters deciding if either Blue or Red are too big is given by a logistic-type interaction term. The intent of the model is to examine the role of influence in complex adversarial situations typical in counter-insurgency, where victory requires a genuine balance between maintaining combat effectiveness and support from a third party whose backing is not always assured.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.