Paper detail

Modelling galaxy stellar mass evolution from z~0.8 to today

We apply the empirical method built for z=0 in the previous work of Wang et al. to a higher redshift, to link galaxy stellar mass directly with its hosting dark matter halo mass at z~0.8. The relation of the galaxy stellar mass and the host halo mass M_infall is constrained by fitting both the stellar mass function and the correlation functions at different stellar mass intervals of the VVDS observation, where M_infall is the mass of the hosting halo at the time when the galaxy was last the central galaxy. We find that for low mass haloes, their residing central galaxies are less massive at high redshift than those at low redshift. For high mass haloes, central galaxies in these haloes at high redshift are a bit more massive than the galaxies at low redshift. Satellite galaxies are less massive at earlier times, for any given mass of hosting haloes. Fitting both the SDSS and VVDS observations simultaneously, we also propose a unified model of the M_stars-M_infall relation, which describes the evolution of central galaxy mass as a function of time. The stellar mass of a satellite galaxy is determined by the same M_stars-M_infall relation of central galaxies at the time when the galaxy is accreted. With these models, we study the amount of galaxy stellar mass increased from z~0.8 to the present day through galaxy mergers and star formation. Low mass galaxies gain their stellar masses from z~0.8 to z=0 mainly through star formation. For galaxies of higher mass, the increase of stellar mass solely through mergers from z=0.8 can make the massive galaxies a factor ~2 larger than observed at z=0. We can also predict stellar mass functions of redshifts up to z~3, and the results are consistent with the latest observations.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.