Paper detail

Modelling control strategies against Classical Swine Fever: influence of traders and markets using static and temporal networks in Ecuador

Classical swine fever (CSF) in Ecuador is prevalent since 1940, pig farming represents an important economic and cultural sector. Recently, the National Veterinary Service (NVS) has implemented individual identification of pigs, movement control and mandatory vaccination against CSF, looking for a future eradication. Our aim was to characterise the pig premises according to risk criteria, analyse the effect of random and targeted strategies to control CSF and consider the temporal development of the network. We used social network analysis (SNA), SIRS (susceptible, infected, recovered, susceptible) network modelling and temporal network analysis. The data set contained 751,003 shipments and 6 million pigs from 2017 to 2019. 165,593 premises were involved: 144,118 farms, 138 industrials, 21,337 traders, and 51 markets. On annual average, 124,976 premises (75%) received or sent one movement with 1.5 pigs, in contrast, 166 (0.01%) with 1,372 movements and 11,607 pigs. Simulations resulted in CSF mean prevalence of 29.93%; Targeted selection strategy reduced the prevalence to 3.3%, while 24% with random selection. Selection of high-risk premises in every province was the best strategy using available surveillance infrastructure. Notably, selecting 10 traders/markets reduced the CSF prevalence to 4%, evidencing their prime influence over the network. Temporal analysis showed an overestimation of 38% (causal fidelity) in the number of transmission paths; The steps to cross the network were 4.3 (average path length), but take approximately 233 days. In conclusion, surveillance strategies applied by the NVS could be more efficient to find cases, reduce the spread of diseases and enable the implementation of risk-based surveillance. To focus the efforts on target selection of high-risk premises, special attention should be given to markets/traders which proved similar disease spread potential.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.