Paper detail

Modeling Warfare in Social Animals: A "Chemical" Approach

The aim of our study is to describe the dynamics of ant battles, with reference to laboratory experiments, by means of a chemical stochastic model. We focus on ants behavior as an interesting topic in order to predict the ecological evolution of invasive species and their spreading. In our work we want to describe the interactions between two groups of different ant species with different war strategies. Our model considers the single ant individuals and fighting groups in a way similar to atoms and molecules, respectively, considering that ant fighting groups remain stable for a relative long time. Starting from a system of differential non-linear equations (DE), derived from the chemical reactions, we obtain a mean field description of the system. The DE approach is valid when the number of individuals of each species is large in the considered unit, while we consider battles of at most 10 vs. 10 individuals, due to the difficulties in following the individual behavior in a large assembly. Therefore, we also adapt a Gillespie algorithm to reproduce the fluctuations around the mean field. The DE scheme is exploited to characterize the stochastic model. The set of parameters of chemical equations, obtained using a minimization algorithm, are used by the Gillespie algorithm to generate the stochastic trajectories. We then fit the stochastic paths with the DE, in order to analyze the variability of the parameters and their variance. Finally, we estimate the goodness of the applied methodology and we confirm that the stochastic approach must be considered for a correct description of the ant fighting dynamics. With respect to other war models, our chemical one considers all phases of the battle and not only casualties. Thus, we can count on more experimental data, but we also have more parameters to fit. In any case, our model allows a much more detailed description of the fights.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.