Paper detail

Modeling the Nuclear Infrared Spectral Energy Distribution of Type II Active Galactic Nuclei

We present results from model fitting to the Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) of a homogeneous sample of Seyfert II galaxies drawn from the $12μ$m Galaxy Sample. Imaging and nuclear flux measurements are presented in an accompanying paper (Videla et al., 2013). Here we add IRS Spitzer observations to further constrain the SEDs after careful subtraction of a starburst component. We use the library of CLUMPY torus models from Nenkova et al.~(2008ab) and also test the two-phase models recently produced by Stalevski et al.~(2012). We find that photometric and spectroscopic observations in the mid-IR (>5mu) are crucial to properly constrain the best-fit torus models. About half of our sources show clear near-IR excess of their SEDs above the best fit models. This problem can be less severe when using the Stalevski et al.~(2012) models. It is not clear what is the nature of this emission since best fitted black body temperatures are very high (~1700-2500 K) and the Type II classification of our sources would correspond to a small probability to peer directly into the hottest regions of the torus. Crucially, the derived torus parameters when using CLUMPY models are quite robust,, independently of whether the sources require an additional black body component or not. Our findings suggest that tori are characterized by N_0 > 5, sigma > 40, tau < 25, i > 40 degrees, Y < 50 and A_v^los ~ 100-300. From these we can determine that typical torus sizes and masses of 0.1-5.0 pc and 10^{4-6} M_\odot. We find tentative evidence that those nuclei with a detected Hidden Broad Line Regions are characterized by lower levels of extinction than those without one. Finally, we find no correlation between the torus properties and the presence of circumnuclear or more global star-formation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.