Paper detail

Modeling the light curve of the transient SCP06F6

We consider simple models based on core collapse or pair-formation supernovae to account for the light curve of the transient SCP06F6. A radioactive decay diffusion model provides estimates of the mass of the required radioactive nickel and the ejecta as functions of the unknown redshift. An opacity change such as by dust formation or a recombination front may account for the rapid decline from maximum. We particularly investigate two specific redshifts: $z=0.143$, for which Gaensicke et al. (2008) have proposed that the unidentified broad absorption features in the spectrum of SCP06F6 are C$_{2}$ Swan bands, and $z=0.57$ based on a crude agreement with the Ca H&K and UV iron-peak absorption features that are characteristic of supernovae of various types. The ejected masses and kinetic energies are smaller for a more tightly constrained model invoking envelope recombination. We also discuss the possibilities of circumstellar matter (CSM) shell diffusion and shock interaction models. In general, optically-thick CSM diffusion models can fit the data with the underlying energy coming from an energetic buried supernova. Models in which the CSM is of lower density so that the shock energy is both rapidly thermalized and radiated tend not to be self-consistent. We suggest that a model of SCP06F6 worth futher exploration is one in which the redshift is $\sim$ 0.57, the spectral features are Ca and iron peak elements, and the light curve is powered by the diffusive release of a substantial amount of energy from nickel decay or from an energetic supernova buried in the ejecta of an LBV-like event.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.