Paper detail

Modeling the ionizing spectra of H ii regions: individual stars versus stellar ensembles

Aims. We study how IMF sampling affects the ionizing flux and emission line spectra of low mass stellar clusters. Methods. We performed 2 x 10^6 Monte Carlo simulations of zero-age solar-metallicity stellar clusters covering the 20 - 10^6 Mo mass range. We study the distribution of cluster stellar masses, Mclus, ionizing fluxes, Q(H0), and effective temperatures, Tclus. We compute photoionization models that broadly describe the results of the simulations and compare them with photoionization grids. Results. Our main results are: (a) A large number of low mass clusters (80% for Mclus = 100 Mo) are unable to form an H ii region. (b) There are a few overluminous stellar clusters that form H ii regions. These overluminous clusters preserve statistically the mean value of <Q(H0)> obtained by synthesis models, but the mean value cannot be used as a description of particular clusters. (c) The ionizing continuum of clusters with Mclus < 10^4 Mo is more accurately described by an individual star with self-consistent effective temperature(T*) and Q(H0) than by the ensemble of stars (or a cluster Tclus) produced by synthesis models. (d)Photoionization grids of stellar clusters can not be used to derive the global properties of low mass clusters. Conclusions. Although variations in the upper mass limit, mup, of the IMF would reproduce the effects of IMF sampling, we find that an ad hoc law that relates mup to Mclus in the modelling of stellar clusters is useless, since: (a) it does not cover the whole range of possible cases, and (b) the modelling of stellar clusters with an IMF is motivated by the need to derive the global properties of the cluster: however, in clusters affected by sampling effects we have no access to global information of the cluster but only particular information about a few individual stars.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.