Paper detail

Modeling the hard states of XTE J1550--564 during its 2000 outburst

We study hard states of the black-hole binary XTE J1550--564 during its 2000 outburst. In order to explain those states at their highest luminosities, $L\sim 10%$ of the Eddington luminosity, $L_{\rm E}$, we propose a specific hot accretion flow model. We point out that the highest values of the hard-state $L$ are substantially above the $L$ an advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF) can produce, $\sim 0.4α^2 L_{\rm E}$, which is only $\sim (3$--$4)%L_{\rm E}$ even for $α$ as high as 0.3. On the other hand, we successfully explain the hard states with $L\sim (4$--$10)%$ using the luminous hot accretion flow (LHAF) model. As $10%L_{\rm E}$ is also roughly the highest luminosity an LHAF can produce, such an agreement between the predicted and observed highest luminosities provides by itself strong support for this model. Then, we study multi-waveband spectral variability during the 2000 outburst. In addition to the primary maxima in the optical light curves, secondary maxima were detected after the transition from the very high state to the hard state. We show that the secondary maxima are well modeled by synchrotron emission from a jet formed during the state transition. We argue that the absence of the corresponding secondary peak in the X-ray light curve indicates that the X-ray jet emission, regardless of its radiative process, synchrotron or its Comptonization, is not important in the hard state compared to the emission from the accretion flow.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.