Paper detail

Modeling the complete set of Cassini's UVIS occultation observations of Enceladus' plume

The Cassini Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph (UVIS) observed a plume of water vapor spewing out from the south polar regions of Enceladus in occultation geometry 7 times during the Cassini mission. Five of them yielded data resolved spatially that allowed fits to a set of individually modeled jets. We created a direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) model to simulate individual water vapor jets with the aim of fitting them to water vapor abundance along the UVIS line of sight during occultation observations. Accurate location and attitude of spacecraft together with positions of Enceladus and Saturn at each observation determine the relationship between the three-dimensional water vapor number density in the plume and the two-dimensional profiles of water vapor abundances along the line of sight recorded by UVIS. By individually fitting observed and modeled jets, every occultation observation of UVIS presented a unique perspective to the physical properties and distribution of the jets. The minimum velocity of water vapor in the jets is determined from the narrowest observed individual jet profile: it ranges from 800 m/s to 1.8 km/s for the UVIS occultation observations. 41 individual jets were required to fit the highest resolution UVIS dataset taken during the Solar occultation however, an alternative larger set of linearly-dependent jets can not be excluded without invoking additional preferably unrelated data from other instruments. A smaller number of jets is required to fit the stellar occultation data because of their spatial resolution and geometry. We identify a set of 37 jets that were repeatedly present in best fits to several UVIS occultation observations. These jets were probably active through the whole Cassini mission.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.