Paper detail

Modeling overcontact binaries, I. The effect of tidal deformation

In the realm of massive stars, strong binary interaction is commonplace. One extreme case are overcontact systems, which is expected to be part of the evolution of all stars evolving towards a merger, and is hypothesized to play a role in the formation of binary black holes. However, important simplifications are made to model the evolution of overcontact binaries, namely that tidal or rotational deformation is frequently ignored. Yet, both observation and theory show that overcontact stars are heavily tidally deformed, leaving a potentially important effect on the outer layers unaccounted for in models. In this work we develop the methodology to represented tidally deformed stars. Using numerical methods, we compute the structure correction factors to the 1D spherical stellar structure equations due to the binary Roche potential, and compare them to existing results and the structure corrections of single rotating stars. We implement the new structure correction factors into the stellar evolution code MESA and explore several case studies. We compare the differences between our simulations when no rotation is included, when we treat rotation using single star corrections (i.e. only accounting for centrifugal deformation) or when we use tidal deformation. We find that ignoring rotation in deformed detached eclipsing binaries can produce a radius discrepancy of up to 5%. The difference between tidal and single star centrifugal distortion models is more benign at 1%, showing that single rotating star models are a suitable approximation of tidally deformed stars in a binary system. In overcontact configurations, we find a similar 5% variation in surface properties as a result of tidal distortion with respect to non-rotating models, showing that it is inappropriate to model binary stars that fill their Roche lobe significantly, as non-rotating.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.